Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-18369| Publication type: | Article in scientific journal |
| Type of review: | Peer review (publication) |
| Title: | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study |
| Authors: | Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca |
| et. al: | No |
| DOI: | 10.1002/nop2.383 10.21256/zhaw-18369 |
| Published in: | Nursing Open |
| Volume(Issue): | 7 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Page(s): | 212 |
| Pages to: | 224 |
| Issue Date: | Sep-2019 |
| Publisher / Ed. Institution: | Wiley |
| ISSN: | 2054-1058 |
| Language: | English |
| Subject (DDC): | 610.73: Nursing |
| Abstract: | Aims: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. Design: Embedded mixed‐methods design. Methods: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1-month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. Results: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/18369 |
| Fulltext version: | Published version |
| License (according to publishing contract): | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: Attribution - Non commercial - No derivatives 4.0 International |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisational Unit: | Institute of Data Analysis and Process Design (IDP) |
| Appears in collections: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huber_et_al-2019-Nursing_Open.pdf | 905.72 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Show full item record
Huber, E., Kleinknecht‐Dolf, M., Kugler, C., Müller, M., & Spirig, R. (2019). Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study. Nursing Open, 7(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383
Huber, E. et al. (2019) ‘Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study’, Nursing Open, 7(1), pp. 212–224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
E. Huber, M. Kleinknecht‐Dolf, C. Kugler, M. Müller, and R. Spirig, “Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study,” Nursing Open, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 212–224, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1002/nop2.383.
HUBER, Evelyn, Michael KLEINKNECHT‐DOLF, Christiane KUGLER, Marianne MÜLLER und Rebecca SPIRIG, 2019. Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : a mixed‐methods study. Nursing Open. September 2019. Bd. 7, Nr. 1, S. 212–224. DOI 10.1002/nop2.383
Huber, Evelyn, Michael Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Christiane Kugler, Marianne Müller, and Rebecca Spirig. 2019. “Validation of the Instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : A Mixed‐Methods Study.” Nursing Open 7 (1): 212–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
Huber, Evelyn, et al. “Validation of the Instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” : A Mixed‐Methods Study.” Nursing Open, vol. 7, no. 1, Sept. 2019, pp. 212–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.