Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-20014
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wagner, Aylin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schaffert, René | - |
dc.contributor.author | Möckli, Nathalie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zúñiga, Franziska | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dratva, Julia | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-14T12:44:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-14T12:44:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-29 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | de_CH |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/20014 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: One way of measuring the quality of home care are quality indicators (QIs) derived from data collected with the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC). In order to produce meaningful results for quality improvement and quality comparisons across home care organizations (HCOs) and over time, RAI-HC QIs must be valid and reliable. The aim of this systematic review was to identify currently existing RAI-HC QIs and to summarize the scientific knowledge on the validity and reliability of these QIs. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library. Studies describing the development process or the psychometric characteristics of RAI-HC QIs were eligible. The data extraction involved a general description of the included studies as well as the identified RAI-HC QIs and information on validity and reliability. The methodological quality of the identified RAI-HC QI sets was assessed using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. Results: Four studies out of 659 initial hits met the inclusion criteria. The included studies described the development and validation process of three RAI-HC QI sets comprising 48 unique RAI-HC QIs, which predominantly refer to outcome of care. Overall, the validity and reliability of the identified RAI-HC QIs were not sufficiently tested. The methodological quality of the three identified RAI-HC QI sets varied across the four AIRE instrument domains. None of the QI sets reached high methodological quality, defined as scores of 50% and higher in all four AIRE instrument domains. Conclusions: This is the first review that systematically summarized and appraised the available scientific evidence on the validity and reliability of RAI-HC QIs. It identified insufficient reporting of RAI-HC QIs validation processes and reliability as well as missing state-of-the-art methodologies. The review provides guidance as to what additional validity and reliability testing are needed to strengthen the scientific soundness of RAI-HC QIs. Considering that RAI-HC QIs are already implemented and used to measure and compare quality of home care, further investigations on RAI-HC QIs reliability and validity is recommended. | de_CH |
dc.language.iso | en | de_CH |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | de_CH |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Health Services Research | de_CH |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | de_CH |
dc.subject | Home care | de_CH |
dc.subject | Home-based care | de_CH |
dc.subject | InterRAI | de_CH |
dc.subject | Nursing | de_CH |
dc.subject | Quality indicators | de_CH |
dc.subject | Reliability | de_CH |
dc.subject | Systematic review | de_CH |
dc.subject | Validity | de_CH |
dc.subject.ddc | 362: Gesundheits- und Sozialdienste | de_CH |
dc.title | Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review | de_CH |
dc.type | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift | de_CH |
dcterms.type | Text | de_CH |
zhaw.departement | Gesundheit | de_CH |
zhaw.organisationalunit | Institut für Public Health (IPH) | de_CH |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x | de_CH |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21256/zhaw-20014 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32349757 | de_CH |
zhaw.funding.eu | No | de_CH |
zhaw.issue | 366 | de_CH |
zhaw.originated.zhaw | Yes | de_CH |
zhaw.publication.status | publishedVersion | de_CH |
zhaw.volume | 20 | de_CH |
zhaw.publication.review | Open peer review | de_CH |
zhaw.funding.snf | 167499 | de_CH |
zhaw.webfeed | G: Arbeit und Gesundheit | de_CH |
zhaw.funding.zhaw | Swiss Home Care Data: Bessere Daten zur Qualität der häuslichen Pflege (Spitex) | de_CH |
zhaw.author.additional | No | de_CH |
zhaw.display.portrait | Yes | de_CH |
Appears in collections: | Publikationen Gesundheit |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s12913-020-05238-x.pdf | Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review | 721.9 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Show simple item record
Wagner, A., Schaffert, R., Möckli, N., Zúñiga, F., & Dratva, J. (2020). Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(366). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x
Wagner, A. et al. (2020) ‘Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review’, BMC Health Services Research, 20(366). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
A. Wagner, R. Schaffert, N. Möckli, F. Zúñiga, and J. Dratva, “Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 20, no. 366, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
WAGNER, Aylin, René SCHAFFERT, Nathalie MÖCKLI, Franziska ZÚÑIGA und Julia DRATVA, 2020. Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 29 April 2020. Bd. 20, Nr. 366. DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x
Wagner, Aylin, René Schaffert, Nathalie Möckli, Franziska Zúñiga, and Julia Dratva. 2020. “Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : A Systematic Review.” BMC Health Services Research 20 (366). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
Wagner, Aylin, et al. “Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : A Systematic Review.” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 20, no. 366, Apr. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.