Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-20014
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Aylin-
dc.contributor.authorSchaffert, René-
dc.contributor.authorMöckli, Nathalie-
dc.contributor.authorZúñiga, Franziska-
dc.contributor.authorDratva, Julia-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T12:44:59Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-14T12:44:59Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-29-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/20014-
dc.description.abstractBackground: One way of measuring the quality of home care are quality indicators (QIs) derived from data collected with the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC). In order to produce meaningful results for quality improvement and quality comparisons across home care organizations (HCOs) and over time, RAI-HC QIs must be valid and reliable. The aim of this systematic review was to identify currently existing RAI-HC QIs and to summarize the scientific knowledge on the validity and reliability of these QIs. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library. Studies describing the development process or the psychometric characteristics of RAI-HC QIs were eligible. The data extraction involved a general description of the included studies as well as the identified RAI-HC QIs and information on validity and reliability. The methodological quality of the identified RAI-HC QI sets was assessed using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. Results: Four studies out of 659 initial hits met the inclusion criteria. The included studies described the development and validation process of three RAI-HC QI sets comprising 48 unique RAI-HC QIs, which predominantly refer to outcome of care. Overall, the validity and reliability of the identified RAI-HC QIs were not sufficiently tested. The methodological quality of the three identified RAI-HC QI sets varied across the four AIRE instrument domains. None of the QI sets reached high methodological quality, defined as scores of 50% and higher in all four AIRE instrument domains. Conclusions: This is the first review that systematically summarized and appraised the available scientific evidence on the validity and reliability of RAI-HC QIs. It identified insufficient reporting of RAI-HC QIs validation processes and reliability as well as missing state-of-the-art methodologies. The review provides guidance as to what additional validity and reliability testing are needed to strengthen the scientific soundness of RAI-HC QIs. Considering that RAI-HC QIs are already implemented and used to measure and compare quality of home care, further investigations on RAI-HC QIs reliability and validity is recommended.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherBioMed Centralde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Health Services Researchde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectHome carede_CH
dc.subjectHome-based carede_CH
dc.subjectInterRAIde_CH
dc.subjectNursingde_CH
dc.subjectQuality indicatorsde_CH
dc.subjectReliabilityde_CH
dc.subjectSystematic reviewde_CH
dc.subjectValidityde_CH
dc.subject.ddc362: Gesundheits- und Sozialdienstede_CH
dc.titleHome care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic reviewde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Public Health (IPH)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-020-05238-xde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-20014-
dc.identifier.pmid32349757de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue366de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume20de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewOpen peer reviewde_CH
zhaw.funding.snf167499de_CH
zhaw.webfeedG: Arbeit und Gesundheitde_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawSwiss Home Care Data: Bessere Daten zur Qualität der häuslichen Pflege (Spitex)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12913-020-05238-x.pdfHome care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review721.9 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Wagner, A., Schaffert, R., Möckli, N., Zúñiga, F., & Dratva, J. (2020). Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(366). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x
Wagner, A. et al. (2020) ‘Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review’, BMC Health Services Research, 20(366). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
A. Wagner, R. Schaffert, N. Möckli, F. Zúñiga, and J. Dratva, “Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 20, no. 366, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
WAGNER, Aylin, René SCHAFFERT, Nathalie MÖCKLI, Franziska ZÚÑIGA und Julia DRATVA, 2020. Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 29 April 2020. Bd. 20, Nr. 366. DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x
Wagner, Aylin, René Schaffert, Nathalie Möckli, Franziska Zúñiga, and Julia Dratva. 2020. “Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : A Systematic Review.” BMC Health Services Research 20 (366). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
Wagner, Aylin, et al. “Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) : A Systematic Review.” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 20, no. 366, Apr. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.