Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Publication type:||Article in scientific journal|
|Type of review:||Peer review (publication)|
|Title:||Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities|
Acosta, Alicia T. R.
Barrera‐Alba, José J.
Carvalho, José C.
Ferreira, Carlos E. L.
Floeter, Sergio R.
Friedlander, Alan M.
Gossner, Martin M.
Hunter, John T.
Huszar, Vera L. M.
Kahilainen, Kimmo K.
Christiaan le Roux, Peter
Teixeira de Lima, Domênica
Lukács, Balázs A.
Marinho, Marcelo M.
Menezes, Luciana S.
Moser, Gleyci A. O.
Ometto, Jean P.
Overbeck, Gerhard E.
Pacheco, Felipe S.
Prieto, Juan A. C.
Rodil, Iván F.
Sabatini, Francesco M.
De Sanctis, Michele
Segura, Angel M.
da Silva, Lucia H. S.
Stevanovic, Zora D.
Tolonen, Kimmo T.
|Published in:||Global Ecology and Biogeography|
|Publisher / Ed. Institution:||Wiley|
|Subjects:||β- diversity; Spatial distance; Biogeography; Environmental gradient; Trait|
|Subject (DDC):||333.7: Land, natural recreational areas|
|Abstract:||Aim: Understanding the variation in community composition and species abundances (i.e., β-diversity) is at the heart of community ecology. A common approach to examine β-diversity is to evaluate directional variation in community composition by measuring the decay in the similarity among pairs of communities along spatial or environmental distance. We provide the first global synthesis of taxonomic and functional distance decay along spatial and environmental distance by analysing 148 datasets comprising different types of organisms and environments. Location: Global. Time period: 1990 to present. Major taxa studied: From diatoms to mammals. Method: We measured the strength of the decay using ranked Mantel tests (Mantel r) and the rate of distance decay as the slope of an exponential fit using generalized linear models. We used null models to test whether functional similarity decays faster or slower than expected given the taxonomic decay along the spatial and environmental distance. We also unveiled the factors driving the rate of decay across the datasets, including latitude, spatial extent, realm and organismal features. Results: Taxonomic distance decay was stronger than functional distance decay along both spatial and environmental distance. Functional distance decay was random given the taxonomic distance decay. The rate of taxonomic and functional spatial distance decay was fastest in the datasets from mid-latitudes. Overall, datasets covering larger spatial extents showed a lower rate of decay along spatial distance but a higher rate of decay along environmental distance. Marine ecosystems had the slowest rate of decay along environmental distances. Main conclusions: In general, taxonomic distance decay is a useful tool for biogeographical research because it reflects dispersal-related factors in addition to species responses to climatic and environmental variables. Moreover, functional distance decay might be a cost-effective option for investigating community changes in heterogeneous environments.|
|Fulltext version:||Published version|
|License (according to publishing contract):||CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International|
|Departement:||Life Sciences and Facility Management|
|Organisational Unit:||Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR)|
|Appears in collections:||Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management|
Files in This Item:
|2022_Graco‐Roza-etal_Distance-decay-global-synthesis.pdf||5.55 MB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.