1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Life Sciences und Facility Management
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRohrbach, Beni-
dc.contributor.authorLaube, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorWeibel, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-16T16:04:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-16T16:04:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0169-2046de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1872-6062de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/11872-
dc.description.abstractProjections pertaining to future land use and land use change may have diverse backgrounds. Often, both local and scientific knowledge encompass important pieces of information for such a projection. Acknowledging the diversity across the two types of knowledge, we investigated their differences and similarities in a twofold case study, conducting a participatory mapping (PM) exercise with local wine growers, as well as a Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE) with non-local experts from science, government and industry. Hence, we not only utilised two different knowledge elicitation methods, but also two types of ‘knowledges’. Within a region dominated by vineyards, and with expected land use change, we compared the two results quantitatively, in a participatory evaluation workshop, and with annotations gained through the participatory mapping exercise. Both methods have their merits, with the results from the participatory mapping perceived as being more plausible, and the MCE scoring higher in terms of spatial resolution. Whilst the participatory mapping yields more and better contextualised information, the results from the MCE can be better compared across study areas.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape and Urban Planningde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectMulti-criteria evaluationde_CH
dc.subjectParticipatory mappingde_CH
dc.subjectLand-usede_CH
dc.subject.ddc333.7: Landflächen, Naturerholungsgebietede_CH
dc.subject.ddc712: Landschaftsgestaltung (Landschaftsdesign)de_CH
dc.titleComparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land usede_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end50de_CH
zhaw.pages.start38de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedGeoinformatikde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Rohrbach, B., Laube, P., & Weibel, R. (2018). Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use. Landscape and Urban Planning, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002
Rohrbach, B., Laube, P. and Weibel, R. (2018) ‘Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use’, Landscape and Urban Planning, pp. 38–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002.
B. Rohrbach, P. Laube, and R. Weibel, “Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use,” Landscape and Urban Planning, pp. 38–50, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002.
ROHRBACH, Beni, Patrick LAUBE und Robert WEIBEL, 2018. Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2018. S. 38–50. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002
Rohrbach, Beni, Patrick Laube, and Robert Weibel. 2018. “Comparing Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Participatory Mapping to Projecting Land Use.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002.
Rohrbach, Beni, et al. “Comparing Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Participatory Mapping to Projecting Land Use.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, pp. 38–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.