Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHöglinger, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T13:21:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-11T13:21:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13705-
dc.description.abstractNormative influence and, more specifically, descriptive norms (Bicchieri 2006, Cialdini 1998) are powerful forces in shaping individual’s behavior in situations where private and collective interest clash. Various experimental studies have shown that individuals can be made to act more or less prosocial by changing their expectations about what other people do in the same situation (e.g. Schultz et al. 2007, Diekmann, Przepiorka and Rauhut 2015). I apply the so-called descriptive norms messaging approach to a prototypical social dilemma of high substantial relevance: the procurement of donor organs and its underlying micro-level decision problem, that is ,individuals’ (not) consenting to post-mortem organ donation. Donor organ shortage is a pervasive problem in Western countries and a main cause is that too few people grant permission for post-mortem organ donation. In order to test whether social norms influence donation consent decisions, I assigned subjects to different descriptive norm messages regarding the consent rate in the population and subsequently elicited their own consent. Results show that a strong descriptive norm message substantially increased stated consent for subjects without a donor card, whereas donor card holders remained unaffected.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectOrgan donationde_CH
dc.subjectProsocial behaviorde_CH
dc.subjectPublic goodde_CH
dc.subjectSocial normde_CH
dc.subject.ddc306.8: Familiensoziologiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc362: Gesundheits- und Sozialdienstede_CH
dc.titleCan social norms overcome a public good dilemma? : experimental evidence for stated consent to organ donationde_CH
dc.typeKonferenz: Sonstigesde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitWinterthurer Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie (WIG)de_CH
zhaw.conference.detailsKongress der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewKeine Begutachtungde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Höglinger, M. (2017). Can social norms overcome a public good dilemma? : experimental evidence for stated consent to organ donation. Kongress Der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft Für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017.
Höglinger, M. (2017) ‘Can social norms overcome a public good dilemma? : experimental evidence for stated consent to organ donation’, in Kongress der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017.
M. Höglinger, “Can social norms overcome a public good dilemma? : experimental evidence for stated consent to organ donation,” in Kongress der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017, 2017.
HÖGLINGER, Marc, 2017. Can social norms overcome a public good dilemma? : experimental evidence for stated consent to organ donation. In: Kongress der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017. Conference presentation. 2017
Höglinger, Marc. 2017. “Can Social Norms Overcome a Public Good Dilemma? : Experimental Evidence for Stated Consent to Organ Donation.” Conference presentation. In Kongress Der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft Für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017.
Höglinger, Marc. “Can Social Norms Overcome a Public Good Dilemma? : Experimental Evidence for Stated Consent to Organ Donation.” Kongress Der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft Für Soziologie 2017, Zürich, 21-24 June 2017, 2017.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.