Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEpprecht, Nils-
dc.contributor.authorVon Wirth, Timo-
dc.contributor.authorStünzi, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorBlumer, Yann-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-22T14:45:52Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-22T14:45:52Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-01-
dc.identifier.issn0016-3287de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1873-6378de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/17642-
dc.description.abstractToday's car-based transportation systems require a transition toward sustainability. This is particularly the case in suburban areas, where the costs for introducing a new transportation system are high due to the low population density. At the same time the negative externalities of the current mobility regime – such as health costs and congestions – are increasing rapidly. Based on expert interviews with car manufacturers, transportation authorities, environmental groups, and scientists we identify two visionary characteristics of future, more sustainable transportation systems: automated driving and sharing. Using these two characteristics, we apply the scenario-axes technique to develop four mobility scenarios for a suburban context that range from business-as-usual to a radical and more sustainable one. In an evaluation with ten criteria that measure a scenario's performance from a user perspective, the radical scenario performs worst since it does not meet current individualistic user requirements. Our findings suggest that lock-ins of users’ expectations act as barriers for the diffusion of novel transportation systems. These barriers cannot be overcome by technological innovations and regulation alone. Hence, we call for innovative arenas, wherein technology and user acceptability could co-evolve.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofFuturesde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectMobility regimede_CH
dc.subjectRadical system innovationde_CH
dc.subjectScenario assessmentde_CH
dc.subjectSocio-techical transitionde_CH
dc.subjectUrban transportationde_CH
dc.subjectUser acceptabilityde_CH
dc.subject.ddc380: Verkehrde_CH
dc.titleAnticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes : how acceptability mattersde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitute for Organizational Viability (IOV)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end40de_CH
zhaw.pages.start30de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume60de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Epprecht, N., Von Wirth, T., Stünzi, C., & Blumer, Y. (2014). Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes : how acceptability matters. Futures, 60, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001
Epprecht, N. et al. (2014) ‘Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes : how acceptability matters’, Futures, 60, pp. 30–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001.
N. Epprecht, T. Von Wirth, C. Stünzi, and Y. Blumer, “Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes : how acceptability matters,” Futures, vol. 60, pp. 30–40, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001.
EPPRECHT, Nils, Timo VON WIRTH, Christian STÜNZI und Yann BLUMER, 2014. Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes : how acceptability matters. Futures. 1 August 2014. Bd. 60, S. 30–40. DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001
Epprecht, Nils, Timo Von Wirth, Christian Stünzi, and Yann Blumer. 2014. “Anticipating Transitions beyond the Current Mobility Regimes : How Acceptability Matters.” Futures 60 (August): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001.
Epprecht, Nils, et al. “Anticipating Transitions beyond the Current Mobility Regimes : How Acceptability Matters.” Futures, vol. 60, Aug. 2014, pp. 30–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.