Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHengartner, Michael Pascal-
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-14T14:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-14T14:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/1848-
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychiatryde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc150: Psychologiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc615: Pharmakologie und Therapeutikde_CH
dc.titleMethodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harmde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementAngewandte Psychologiede_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitPsychologisches Institut (PI)de_CH
zhaw.publisher.placeLausannede_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-1524-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00275de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume8de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedKlinische Psychologiede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Antidepressant Efficacy and Harm.pdf216.29 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Hengartner, M. P. (2017). Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524
Hengartner, M.P. (2017) ‘Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.
M. P. Hengartner, “Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 8, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-1524.
HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal, 2017. Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Dezember 2017. Bd. 8. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-1524
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. 2017. “Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies : Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 8 (December). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. “Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies : Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 8, Dec. 2017, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.