Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-21416
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJobin, Marilou-
dc.contributor.authorSiegrist, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T10:27:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-25T10:27:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0272-4332de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1539-6924de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/21416-
dc.description.abstractDue to the renewed increase in CO2 emissions seen in recent years, the deployment of climate engineering technologies might become necessary if the global temperature increase is to be kept within 1.5 °C. If climate engineering is to be deployed, however, public support is required. The present study hence compared public support for a broad range of climate engineering technologies. Further, the factors that drive public support were investigated and compared across the technologies. In an online survey conducted in Switzerland, respondents (n = 1,575) were randomly allocated to the description of 1 of 10 climate engineering technologies, of which 7 were specific carbon dioxide removal measures and 3 were solar radiation management measures. The results show that the level of public support for afforestation was the highest. The levels of public support for the other climate engineering technologies were relatively similar, although a tendency for solar radiation management to have a lower level of support was identified. Across all the investigated climate engineering technologies, the perceived benefits were an important driver of public support. Additionally, for all the technologies but afforestation, a higher level of trust in industry/science/government increased the level of public support, whereas the factor perceived risks and tampering with nature was found to be a negative predictor of support. The present findings suggest that there are opportunities available for the deployment of several climate engineering technologies in combination with other mitigation measures. Communicating the benefits of such technologies might be an effective strategy in terms of fostering increased support.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherWileyde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofRisk Analysisde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectBenefit perceptionde_CH
dc.subjectClimate engineeringde_CH
dc.subjectTampering with naturede_CH
dc.subjectTechnology acceptancede_CH
dc.subjectTrustde_CH
dc.subject.ddc338.927: Umweltökonomie und nachhaltige Entwicklungde_CH
dc.titleSupport for the deployment of climate engineering : a comparison of ten different technologiesde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Innovation und Entrepreneurship (IIE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/risa.13462de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-21416-
dc.identifier.pmid32112448de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue5de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end1078de_CH
zhaw.pages.start1058de_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume40de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2022-02-28de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Jobin-Siegrist_Support-deployment-climate-engineering-technologies.pdfAccepted Version569.45 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.