1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Angewandte Psychologie
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLemke, Rahel-
dc.contributor.authorBurtscher, Michael Josef-
dc.contributor.authorSeelandt, Julia C.-
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Bastian-
dc.contributor.authorKolbe, Michaela-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-08T15:34:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-08T15:34:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-09-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23415-
dc.description.abstractBackground Speaking up with concerns in the interest of patient safety has been identified as important for the quality and safety of patient care. The study objectives were to identify how anaesthesia care providers speak up, how their colleagues react to it, whether there is an association among speak up form and reaction, and how this reaction is associated with further speak up. Methods Data were collected over 3 months at a single centre in Switzerland by observing 49 anaesthesia care providers while performing induction of general anaesthesia in 53 anaesthesia teams. Speaking up and reactions to speaking up were measured by event-based behaviour coding. Results Instances of speaking up were classified as opinion (59.6%), oblique hint (37.2%), inquiry (30.7%), and observation (16.7%). Most speak up occurred as a combination of different forms. Reactions to speak up included short approval (36.5%), elaboration (35.9%), no verbal reaction (26.3%), or rejection (1.28%). Speaking up was implemented in 89.1% of cases. Inquiry was associated with an increased likelihood of recipients discussing the respective issue (odds ratio [OR]=13.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9–31.5; P<0.0001) and with a decreased likelihood of implementing the speak up during the same induction (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.88; P=0.03). Reacting with elaboration to the first speak up was associated with decreased further speak up during the same induction (relative risk [RR]=0.42; 95% CI, 0.21–0.83; P=0.018). Conclusion Our study provides insights into the form and function of speaking up in clinical environments and points to a perceived dilemma of speaking up via questions.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Anaesthesiade_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectAssertivenessde_CH
dc.subjectGroup processesde_CH
dc.subjectInteractionde_CH
dc.subjectPatient safetyde_CH
dc.subjectRespondingde_CH
dc.subjectSpeaking upde_CH
dc.subject.ddc610.73: Pflegede_CH
dc.titleAssociations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia : a prospective observational studyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementAngewandte Psychologiede_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitPsychologisches Institut (PI)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid34511257de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.funding.snf169785de_CH
zhaw.webfeedDiagnostik und Beratungde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Lemke, R., Burtscher, M. J., Seelandt, J. C., Grande, B., & Kolbe, M. (2021). Associations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia : a prospective observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014
Lemke, R. et al. (2021) ‘Associations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia : a prospective observational study’, British Journal of Anaesthesia [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014.
R. Lemke, M. J. Burtscher, J. C. Seelandt, B. Grande, and M. Kolbe, “Associations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia : a prospective observational study,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014.
LEMKE, Rahel, Michael Josef BURTSCHER, Julia C. SEELANDT, Bastian GRANDE und Michaela KOLBE, 2021. Associations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia : a prospective observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 9 September 2021. DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014
Lemke, Rahel, Michael Josef Burtscher, Julia C. Seelandt, Bastian Grande, and Michaela Kolbe. 2021. “Associations of Form and Function of Speaking up in Anaesthesia : A Prospective Observational Study.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, September. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014.
Lemke, Rahel, et al. “Associations of Form and Function of Speaking up in Anaesthesia : A Prospective Observational Study.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Sept. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.