1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Life Sciences und Facility Management
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-26192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrajçe, Aleksandër-
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, Gjorge-
dc.contributor.authorKeçi, Erjola-
dc.contributor.authorMajić, Aleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorMelovski, Dime-
dc.contributor.authorMersini, Kujtim-
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Sabit-
dc.contributor.authorSkrbinšek, Tomaž-
dc.contributor.authorStojanov, Aleksandar-
dc.contributor.authorTodorovska, Aleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorvon Arx, Manuela-
dc.contributor.authorLinnell, John D.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T10:47:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-25T10:47:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2351-9894de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/26192-
dc.description.abstractWe tested differences in attitudes towards bears, wolves and lynx among the rural public in Albania and Macedonia through information collected from a questionnaire survey (n = 759). Wolves were the species with the least positive attitudes among the rural public and had the lowest support for conservation compared with bears and lynx. In addition, conflict perception of wolves was higher than for bears and lynx. We argue that, based on species specific differences in public attitudes, conservation initiatives and management plans for large carnivores should deal with wolves separately from bears and lynx, as lower public support for wolves might jeopardise the conservation of the two other large carnivores. Bears and lynx can be potentially treated together in conservation initiatives based on the similar levels of public support for conservation, however, from a conflict-management point of view, all three species need to be addressed separately.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Ecology and Conservationde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectLarge carnivorede_CH
dc.subjectHuman–wildlife conflictde_CH
dc.subjectHuman dimensionde_CH
dc.subjectAlbaniade_CH
dc.subjectMacedoniade_CH
dc.subjectBearde_CH
dc.subjectWolfde_CH
dc.subjectLynxde_CH
dc.subject.ddc333: Bodenwirtschaft und Ressourcende_CH
dc.subject.ddc590: Tiere (Zoologie)de_CH
dc.titleAll carnivores are not equal in the rural people's view : should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?de_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-26192-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issuee00677de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume19de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_Trajce-etal_All-carnivores-are-not-equal-rural-peoples-view_gecco.pdf1.81 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Trajçe, A., Ivanov, G., Keçi, E., Majić, A., Melovski, D., Mersini, K., Mustafa, S., Skrbinšek, T., Stojanov, A., Todorovska, A., von Arx, M., & Linnell, J. D. C. (2019). All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view : should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts? Global Ecology and Conservation, 19(e00677). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677
Trajçe, A. et al. (2019) ‘All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view : should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?’, Global Ecology and Conservation, 19(e00677). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677.
A. Trajçe et al., “All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view : should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?,” Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 19, no. e00677, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677.
TRAJÇE, Aleksandër, Gjorge IVANOV, Erjola KEÇI, Aleksandra MAJIĆ, Dime MELOVSKI, Kujtim MERSINI, Sabit MUSTAFA, Tomaž SKRBINŠEK, Aleksandar STOJANOV, Aleksandra TODOROVSKA, Manuela VON ARX und John D.C. LINNELL, 2019. All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view : should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts? Global Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Bd. 19, Nr. e00677. DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677
Trajçe, Aleksandër, Gjorge Ivanov, Erjola Keçi, Aleksandra Majić, Dime Melovski, Kujtim Mersini, Sabit Mustafa, et al. 2019. “All Carnivores Are Not Equal in the Rural People’s View : Should We Develop Conservation Plans for Functional Guilds or Individual Species in the Face of Conflicts?” Global Ecology and Conservation 19 (e00677). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677.
Trajçe, Aleksandër, et al. “All Carnivores Are Not Equal in the Rural People’s View : Should We Develop Conservation Plans for Functional Guilds or Individual Species in the Face of Conflicts?” Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 19, no. e00677, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00677.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.