Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-29550
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLardos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorPatmore, Kristina-
dc.contributor.authorAllkin, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorLazarou, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorNesbitt, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorScott, Andrew C.-
dc.contributor.authorZipser, Barbara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T15:51:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-10T15:51:45Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-19-
dc.identifier.issn0378-8741de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1872-7573de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/29550-
dc.description.abstractEthnopharmacological relevance: In recent decades, the study of historical texts has attracted research interest, particularly in ethnopharmacology. All studies of the materia medica cited in ancient and medieval texts share a concern, however, as to the reliability of modern identifications of these substances. Previous studies of European or Mediterranean texts relied mostly on authoritative dictionaries or glossaries providing botanical identities for the historical plant names in question. Several identities they suggest, however, are questionable and real possibility of error exists. Aim of the study: This study aims to develop and document a novel and interdisciplinary methodology providing more objective assessment of the identity of the plants (and minerals) described in these resources. Materials and methods: We developed an iterative experimental approach, using the 13th century Byzantine recipe text John the Physician's Therapeutics in its Commentary version (JC) as a case study. The methodology has six stages and relies on comparative analyses including statistical evaluation of botanical descriptions and information about medicinal uses drawn from both historical and modern sources. Stages 1-4 create the dataset, stage 5 derives the primary outcomes to be reviewed by experts in stage 6. Results: Using Disocorides' De Materia Medica (DMM) (1st century CE) as the culturally related reference text for the botanical descriptions of the plants cited in JC, allowed us to link the 194 plants used medicinally in JC with 252 plants cited in DMM. Our test sample for subsequent analyses consisted of the 50 JC plant names (corresponding to 61 DMM plants) for which DMM holds rich morphological information, and the 130 candidate species which have been suggested in the literature as potential botanical identities of those 50 JC plant names. Statistical evaluation of the comparative analyses revealed that in the majority of the cases, our method detected the candidate species having a higher likelihood of being the correct attribution from among the pool of suggested candidates. Final assessment and revision provided a list of the challenges associated with applying our methodology more widely and recommendations on how to address these issues. Conclusions: We offer this multidisciplinary approach to more evidence-based assessment of the identity of plants in historical texts providing a measure of confidence for each suggested identity. Despite the experimental nature of our methodology and its limitations, its application allowed us to draw conclusions about the validity of suggested candidate plants as well as to distinguish between alternative candidates of the same historical plant name. Fully documenting the methodology facilitates its application to historical texts of any kind of cultural or linguistic background.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ethnopharmacologyde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectDioscoridesde_CH
dc.subjectHerbalsde_CH
dc.subjectMateria medicade_CH
dc.subjectMediterraneande_CH
dc.subject.ddc615: Pharmakologie und Therapeutikde_CH
dc.titleA systematic methodology to assess the identity of plants in historical texts : a case study based on the Byzantine pharmacy text John the Physician's Therapeuticsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Chemie und Biotechnologie (ICBT)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-29550-
dc.identifier.pmid38128894de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue117622de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume322de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedCC Drug Discoveryde_CH
zhaw.webfeedPhytopharmaziede_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawPlants and Minerals in Byzantine Popular Pharmacy. A New Multidisciplinary Approachde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
zhaw.relation.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.17637/rh.23736189.v1de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_Lardos-etal_Plant-identity-assessment-in-historical-texts_JEP.pdf875.36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Lardos, A., Patmore, K., Allkin, R., Lazarou, R., Nesbitt, M., Scott, A. C., & Zipser, B. (2023). A systematic methodology to assess the identity of plants in historical texts : a case study based on the Byzantine pharmacy text John the Physician’s Therapeutics. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 322(117622). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622
Lardos, A. et al. (2023) ‘A systematic methodology to assess the identity of plants in historical texts : a case study based on the Byzantine pharmacy text John the Physician’s Therapeutics’, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 322(117622). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622.
A. Lardos et al., “A systematic methodology to assess the identity of plants in historical texts : a case study based on the Byzantine pharmacy text John the Physician’s Therapeutics,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 322, no. 117622, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622.
LARDOS, Andreas, Kristina PATMORE, Robert ALLKIN, Rebecca LAZAROU, Mark NESBITT, Andrew C. SCOTT und Barbara ZIPSER, 2023. A systematic methodology to assess the identity of plants in historical texts : a case study based on the Byzantine pharmacy text John the Physician’s Therapeutics. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 19 Dezember 2023. Bd. 322, Nr. 117622. DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622
Lardos, Andreas, Kristina Patmore, Robert Allkin, Rebecca Lazarou, Mark Nesbitt, Andrew C. Scott, and Barbara Zipser. 2023. “A Systematic Methodology to Assess the Identity of Plants in Historical Texts : A Case Study Based on the Byzantine Pharmacy Text John the Physician’s Therapeutics.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 322 (117622). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622.
Lardos, Andreas, et al. “A Systematic Methodology to Assess the Identity of Plants in Historical Texts : A Case Study Based on the Byzantine Pharmacy Text John the Physician’s Therapeutics.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 322, no. 117622, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117622.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.