1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4375
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuber, Marion-
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorHund-Georgiadis, Margret-
dc.contributor.authorMäder, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorBorgwardt, Stephan-
dc.contributor.authorStieglitz, Rolf-Dieter-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-20T15:08:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-20T15:08:32Z-
dc.date.issued2014-12-
dc.identifier.issn2296-990Xde_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/16209-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Clinical assessments should meet the general psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Furthermore there are requirements in matters of diagnostic validity and usability. In regards to patients with severe brain damage, both issues can mainly be implemented by detecting and assessing returning abilities as early as possible, in order to use them for treatment planning. Main aim of this article is to investigate whether the newly developed and validated interprofessional Basel Vegetative State Assessment (BAVESTA) meets these practice criteria. Method: Data were collected as part of validity assessment of BAVESTA. Using the Glasgow Coma Scale as a reference, predictive parameters and measures of effect are calculated. Moreover, expert users were interviewed and results are presented in a descriptive way. Results: With a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.85, the BAVESTA can be regarded as suitable in differentiating between vegetative state and further states of remission such as the minimally conscious state. Expert users regard BAVESTA as eligible for mapping rehabilitative process of patients with severely impaired consciousness. They agree upon the fact that all relevant areas are covered by BAVESTA. Discussion: The BAVESTA displays high levels of differentiation, in regards to both sensitivity and specificity. However, measures of effect ought generally to be regarded with caution, as reference standards have not been developed for the area of rehabilitation. Considering time expenditure, BAVESTA is rated as only marginally feasible by expert users. It should be continued to investigate BAVESTA in regards to its diagnostic quality, integrating electrophysical diagnostic tools as reference standards.de_CH
dc.language.isodede_CH
dc.publisherDe Gruyterde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Health Professionsde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectVegetative statede_CH
dc.subjectInterprofessionalde_CH
dc.subjectAssessmentde_CH
dc.subjectWachkomade_CH
dc.subjectApallisches Syndromde_CH
dc.subjectminimally conscious statede_CH
dc.subjectRehabilitationde_CH
dc.subjectScreeningde_CH
dc.subjectSensitivitätde_CH
dc.subjectSpezifitätde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystemsde_CH
dc.titleDiagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTAde_CH
dc.title.alternativeDiagnostic validity of the Basler Vegetative State Assessment - BAVESTAde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-4375-
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ijhp-2014-0004de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end60de_CH
zhaw.pages.start50de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume1de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2014_Huber_M_Diagnostische_Validität_des_Basler_Vegetative_State_Assessments_BAVESTA.pdf561.69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Huber, M., Koch, S., Hund-Georgiadis, M., Mäder, M., Borgwardt, S., & Stieglitz, R.-D. (2014). Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA. International Journal of Health Professions, 1(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4375
Huber, M. et al. (2014) ‘Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA’, International Journal of Health Professions, 1(1), pp. 50–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4375.
M. Huber, S. Koch, M. Hund-Georgiadis, M. Mäder, S. Borgwardt, and R.-D. Stieglitz, “Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA,” International Journal of Health Professions, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–60, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-4375.
HUBER, Marion, Stephanie KOCH, Margret HUND-GEORGIADIS, Mark MÄDER, Stephan BORGWARDT und Rolf-Dieter STIEGLITZ, 2014. Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA. International Journal of Health Professions. Dezember 2014. Bd. 1, Nr. 1, S. 50–60. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-4375
Huber, Marion, Stephanie Koch, Margret Hund-Georgiadis, Mark Mäder, Stephan Borgwardt, and Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz. 2014. “Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA.” International Journal of Health Professions 1 (1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4375.
Huber, Marion, et al. “Diagnostische Validität des Basler Vegetative State Assessments - BAVESTA.” International Journal of Health Professions, vol. 1, no. 1, Dec. 2014, pp. 50–60, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4375.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.