Publication type: Conference paper
Type of review: Peer review (publication)
Title: A formal representation of terms and processes for the transition from risk to resilience and sustainability management
Authors: Mock, Ralf Günter
Zipper, Christian
et. al: No
Proceedings: Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference
Editors of the parent work: Baraldi, Piero
Di Maio, Francesco
Zio, Enrico
Conference details: 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (ESREL2020 PSAM15), Venice, Italy, 1-5 November 2020
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher / Ed. Institution: Research Publishing
Publisher / Ed. Institution: Singapore
ISBN: 978-981-14-8593-0
Language: English
Subjects: Risiko; Resilienz; Nachhaltigkeit
Subject (DDC): 658.4: Executive Management
Abstract: Starting point of discussion in this paper is the well established concept of risk and risk management at organisations. However, this concept becomes currently challenged because of new stakeholders requirements as resilience and sustainability. This raises the question for organisations to what extent these three concepts are compatible in management processes and where, at best, a transformation from risk to resilience and sustainability (RRS) can take place. To answer this question a formal framework of management processes in general is presented. For this purpose the St. Gallen Management Model and the (risk) management process according to ISO-31000 is transferred to a Class Diagram (CD) to depict the common view of a management framework. Then, the attributes of classes are identified and specified for RRS by literature research and with regard to operational aspects resulting in a comparative CD. Maturity and level of usefulness are evaluated and ranked. As a result, organisations view RRS mainly as a monetary task which, then, enables them to make a (simplified) transformation towards integrative management processes. However, the usual more comprehensive definitions of these terms and their lack of standardisation contradict this simple approach. The paper shows the use of CDs to compare RRS management processes and the resulting interfaces and tasks for organisations.
Fulltext version: Published version
License (according to publishing contract): Licence according to publishing contract
Departement: School of Engineering
Organisational Unit: Institute of Sustainable Development (INE)
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.