Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-21281Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wagner, Aylin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zúñiga, Franziska | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rüesch, Peter | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schaffert, René | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dratva, Julia | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-14T10:11:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-14T10:11:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | de_CH |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/21281 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Despite an increasing importance of home care, quality assurance in this healthcare sector in Switzerland is hardly established. In 2010, Swiss home care quality indicators (QIs) based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) were developed. However, these QIs have not been revised since, although internationally new RAI-HC QIs have emerged. The objective of this study was to assess the appropriateness of RAI-HC QIs to measure quality of home care in Switzerland from a public health and healthcare providers’ perspective. Methods: First, the appropriateness of RAI-HC QIs, identified in a recent systematic review, was assessed by a multidisciplinary expert panel based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method taking into account indicators’ public health relevance, potential of influence, and comprehensibility. Second, the QIs selected by the experts were afterwards rated regarding their relevance, potential of influence, and practicability from a healthcare providers’ perspective in focus groups with home care nurses based on the Nominal-Group-Technique. Data were analyzed using median scores and the Disagreement Index. Results: 18 of 43 RAI-HC QIs were rated appropriate by the experts from a public health perspective. The 18 QIs cover clinical, psychosocial, functional and service use aspects. Seven of the 18 QIs were subsequently rated appropriate by home care nurses from a healthcare providers’ perspective. The focus of these QIs is narrow, because three of seven QIs are pain-related. From both perspectives, the majority of RAI-HC QIs were rated inappropriate because of insufficient potential of influence, with healthcare providers rating them more critically. Conclusions: The study shows that the appropriateness of RAI-HC QIs differs according to the stakeholder perspective and the intended use of QIs. The findings of this study can guide policy-makers and home care organizations on selecting QIs and to critically reflect on their appropriate use. | de_CH |
| dc.language.iso | en | de_CH |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | de_CH |
| dc.relation.ispartof | PLOS ONE | de_CH |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | de_CH |
| dc.subject | Spitex | de_CH |
| dc.subject | Qualitätsindikator | de_CH |
| dc.subject | Qualitätsmessung | de_CH |
| dc.subject | Pflege | de_CH |
| dc.subject | Delphi-Methode | de_CH |
| dc.subject.ddc | 362: Gesundheits- und Sozialdienste | de_CH |
| dc.title | Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : a public health and healthcare providers' perspective | de_CH |
| dc.type | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift | de_CH |
| dcterms.type | Text | de_CH |
| zhaw.departement | Gesundheit | de_CH |
| zhaw.organisationalunit | Institut für Public Health (IPH) | de_CH |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0244577 | de_CH |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.21256/zhaw-21281 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 33378348 | de_CH |
| zhaw.funding.eu | No | de_CH |
| zhaw.issue | 12 | de_CH |
| zhaw.originated.zhaw | Yes | de_CH |
| zhaw.pages.start | e0244577 | de_CH |
| zhaw.publication.status | publishedVersion | de_CH |
| zhaw.volume | 15 | de_CH |
| zhaw.publication.review | Peer review (Publikation) | de_CH |
| zhaw.funding.snf | 167499 | de_CH |
| zhaw.webfeed | G: Arbeit und Gesundheit | de_CH |
| zhaw.funding.zhaw | Swiss Home Care Data: Bessere Daten zur Qualität der häuslichen Pflege (Spitex) | de_CH |
| zhaw.author.additional | No | de_CH |
| zhaw.display.portrait | Yes | de_CH |
| Appears in collections: | Publikationen Gesundheit | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020_Wagner-etal_Selecting-home-care-quality-indicators-RAI-HC.pdf | 646.66 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Show simple item record
Wagner, A., Zúñiga, F., Rüesch, P., Schaffert, R., & Dratva, J. (2020). Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : a public health and healthcare providers’ perspective. Plos One, 15(12), e0244577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244577
Wagner, A. et al. (2020) ‘Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : a public health and healthcare providers” perspective’, PLOS ONE, 15(12), p. e0244577. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244577.
A. Wagner, F. Zúñiga, P. Rüesch, R. Schaffert, and J. Dratva, “Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : a public health and healthcare providers’ perspective,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 12, p. e0244577, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244577.
WAGNER, Aylin, Franziska ZÚÑIGA, Peter RÜESCH, René SCHAFFERT und Julia DRATVA, 2020. Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : a public health and healthcare providers‘ perspective. PLOS ONE. 2020. Bd. 15, Nr. 12, S. e0244577. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244577
Wagner, Aylin, Franziska Zúñiga, Peter Rüesch, René Schaffert, and Julia Dratva. 2020. “Selecting Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : A Public Health and Healthcare Providers’ Perspective.” Plos One 15 (12): e0244577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244577.
Wagner, Aylin, et al. “Selecting Home Care Quality Indicators Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland : A Public Health and Healthcare Providers’ Perspective.” Plos One, vol. 15, no. 12, 2020, p. e0244577, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244577.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.