Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-23449
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStocker, Christa-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T11:25:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-11T11:25:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1615-3014de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23449-
dc.description.abstractNouns referring to persons are “vehicles of our thoughts” (Hermanns 2012b: 62). As labels, they refer to social categories, thereby both reflecting social realities and preserving them at the same time. If social realities change, language usage changes as well. With the abandonment of a historical concept, the designation associated with it also loses its rich semantic filling. The semantic filling, however, can be reconstructed from a historical perspective using a contextsensitive text and discourse analysis. This article aims to reconstruct Backfisch – the designation and social category for teenage girls in the second half of the 19th century – with surprising findings: German designations for teenage girls display a habitual mismatch between grammatical gender and sex. While this incongruency is common, it is not accidental. Instead, it continuously transports semantic features, both in the neuter, with the reification of adolescent girls that conform to their female gender role, and in the masculine, with male category bound features of Backfische, whose behaviour conflicts with the expectancies that a female gender role evokes. Masculine gender is thus a manifestation of behaviour deviant from a gender role but nevertheless positively evaluated. A possible reason for this are the category-bound male features – assessed positively – that are transferred to the female Backfisch category and that have the effect of a temporary status enhancement.de_CH
dc.language.isodede_CH
dc.publisherBern Open Publishingde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofLinguistik Onlinede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de_CH
dc.subjectPersonenbezeichnungde_CH
dc.subjectStereotypde_CH
dc.subjectLinguistikde_CH
dc.subjectKategorisierungde_CH
dc.subjectNamede_CH
dc.subjectKollokationde_CH
dc.subjectSemantikde_CH
dc.subjectGenusde_CH
dc.subjectMentalitätsgeschichtede_CH
dc.subjectSexusde_CH
dc.subjectGenderde_CH
dc.subject.ddc401.4: Terminologie, Diskursanalyse, Pragmatikde_CH
dc.subject.ddc415: Grammatikde_CH
dc.titleGenus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCHde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementAngewandte Linguistikde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Übersetzen und Dolmetschen (IUED)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.13092/lo.107.7685de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-23449-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue2de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end40de_CH
zhaw.pages.start21de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume107de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Angewandte Linguistik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Stocker_Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz.pdf632.02 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Stocker, C. (2021). Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH. Linguistik Online, 107(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.107.7685
Stocker, C. (2021) ‘Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH’, Linguistik Online, 107(2), pp. 21–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.107.7685.
C. Stocker, “Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH,” Linguistik Online, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 21–40, 2021, doi: 10.13092/lo.107.7685.
STOCKER, Christa, 2021. Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH. Linguistik Online. 2021. Bd. 107, Nr. 2, S. 21–40. DOI 10.13092/lo.107.7685
Stocker, Christa. 2021. “Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH.” Linguistik Online 107 (2): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.107.7685.
Stocker, Christa. “Genus-Sexus-Inkongruenz in der Bezeichnungspraxis : Überlegungen zur Kategorie BACKFISCH.” Linguistik Online, vol. 107, no. 2, 2021, pp. 21–40, https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.107.7685.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.