Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-24240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarks, Miriam-
dc.contributor.authorGrobet, Cécile-
dc.contributor.authorAudigé, Laurent-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T10:17:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-17T10:17:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1573-2649de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/24240-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim was to investigate the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L utility index in patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) arthroplasty. Methods: In this prospective study, all patients completed the EQ-5D-5L before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. In addition, RCR patients completed the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), TSA patients completed the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and CMC I patients completed the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (brief MHQ) at each designated time point. Construct validity (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r), responsiveness (effect size), minimal important difference (MID), minimal important change (MIC), and floor and ceiling effects of the EQ-5D-5L were determined. To test discriminative ability, EQ-5D-5L utility indices of patients who were in a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) or not at follow-up were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: We included 153 RCR, 150 TSA, and 151 CMC I patients. The EQ-5D-5L utility index correlated with the OSS (r?=?0.73), SPADI (r?=?-?0.65) and brief MHQ (r?=?0.61). The effect sizes were 1.3 (RCR and CMC I group) and 1.1 (TSA). The MID and MIC ranged from 0.027 to 0.209. Ceiling effects were found. The EQ-5D-5L utility index differed significantly between patients being in a PASS versus patients who were not in a PASS. Conclusion: The EQ-5D-5L utility index shows good construct validity, responsiveness and discriminative ability in patients after arthroscopic RCR, TSA and CMC I arthroplasty and is suitable to quantify quality of life.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSpringerde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofQuality of Life Researchde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectMeasurement propertyde_CH
dc.subjectPsychometric propertyde_CH
dc.subjectQuality of lifede_CH
dc.subjectUpper extremityde_CH
dc.subject.ddc362.1041: Gesundheitsökonomiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc617.5: Orthopädische Chirurgiede_CH
dc.titleValidity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplastyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitWinterthurer Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie (WIG)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-24240-
dc.identifier.pmid33973108de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue10de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end2982de_CH
zhaw.pages.start2973de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume30de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedW: Spitzenpublikationde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Marks-Grobet-Audige_Validity-Responsiveness-Shoulder.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Marks, M., Grobet, C., & Audigé, L. (2021). Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Quality of Life Research, 30(10), 2973–2982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7
Marks, M., Grobet, C. and Audigé, L. (2021) ‘Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty’, Quality of Life Research, 30(10), pp. 2973–2982. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.
M. Marks, C. Grobet, and L. Audigé, “Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2973–2982, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.
MARKS, Miriam, Cécile GROBET und Laurent AUDIGÉ, 2021. Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Quality of Life Research. 2021. Bd. 30, Nr. 10, S. 2973–2982. DOI 10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7
Marks, Miriam, Cécile Grobet, and Laurent Audigé. 2021. “Validity, Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the EQ-5D-5L in Patients after Rotator Cuff Repair, Shoulder Arthroplasty or Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.” Quality of Life Research 30 (10): 2973–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.
Marks, Miriam, et al. “Validity, Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the EQ-5D-5L in Patients after Rotator Cuff Repair, Shoulder Arthroplasty or Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.” Quality of Life Research, vol. 30, no. 10, 2021, pp. 2973–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.