Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty

Marks, Miriam; Grobet, Cécile; Audigé, Laurent

doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-24240

Publication type:	Article in scientific journal
Type of review:	Peer review (publication)
Title:	Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty
Authors:	Marks, Miriam Grobet, Cécile Audigé, Laurent
et. al:	No
DOI:	10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7 10.21256/zhaw-24240
Published in:	Quality of Life Research
Volume(Issue):	30
Issue:	10
Page(s):	2973
Pages to:	2982
Issue Date:	2021
Publisher / Ed. Institution:	Springer
ISSN:	0962-9343 1573-2649
Language:	English
Subjects:	Measurement property; Psychometric property; Quality of life; Upper extremity
Subject (DDC):	362.1041: Health economics 617.5: Orthopaedic surgery
Abstract:	Purpose: The aim was to investigate the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L utility index in patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) arthroplasty. Methods: In this prospective study, all patients completed the EQ-5D-5L before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. In addition, RCR patients completed the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), TSA patients completed the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and CMC I patients completed the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (brief MHQ) at each designated time point. Construct validity (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r), responsiveness (effect size), minimal important difference (MID), minimal important change (MIC), and floor and ceiling effects of the EQ-5D-5L were determined. To test discriminative ability, EQ-5D-5L utility indices of patients who were in a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) or not at follow-up were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: We included 153 RCR, 150 TSA, and 151 CMC I patients. The EQ-5D-5L utility index correlated with the OSS (r?=?0.73), SPADI (r?=?-?0.65) and brief MHQ (r?=?0.61). The effect sizes were 1.3 (RCR and CMC I group) and 1.1 (TSA). The MID and MIC ranged from 0.027 to 0.209. Ceiling effects were found. The EQ-5D-5L utility index differed significantly between patients being in a PASS versus patients who were not in a PASS. Conclusion: The EQ-5D-5L utility index shows good construct validity, responsiveness and discriminative ability in patients after arthroscopic RCR, TSA and CMC I arthroplasty and is suitable to quantify quality of life.
URI:	https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/24240
Fulltext version:	Published version
License (according to publishing contract):	CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
Departement:	School of Management and Law
Organisational Unit:	Winterthur Institute of Health Economics (WIG)
Appears in collections:	Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
2021_Marks-Grobet-Audige_Validity-Responsiveness-Shoulder.pdf		1.02 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show full item record

Marks, M., Grobet, C., & Audigé, L. (2021). Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Quality of Life Research, 30(10), 2973–2982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7

Marks, M., Grobet, C. and Audigé, L. (2021) ‘Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty’, Quality of Life Research, 30(10), pp. 2973–2982. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.

M. Marks, C. Grobet, and L. Audigé, “Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2973–2982, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.

MARKS, Miriam, Cécile GROBET und Laurent AUDIGÉ, 2021. Validity, responsiveness and minimal important change of the EQ-5D-5L in patients after rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. Quality of Life Research. 2021. Bd. 30, Nr. 10, S. 2973–2982. DOI 10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7

Marks, Miriam, Cécile Grobet, and Laurent Audigé. 2021. “Validity, Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the EQ-5D-5L in Patients after Rotator Cuff Repair, Shoulder Arthroplasty or Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.” Quality of Life Research 30 (10): 2973–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.

Marks, Miriam, et al. “Validity, Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the EQ-5D-5L in Patients after Rotator Cuff Repair, Shoulder Arthroplasty or Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.” Quality of Life Research, vol. 30, no. 10, 2021, pp. 2973–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02849-7.