1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-27767
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuica, Zorica-
dc.contributor.authorPlatteau-Waldmeier, Petra-
dc.contributor.authorKoppel, Szabina-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt-Trucksaess, Arno-
dc.contributor.authorEttlin, Thierry-
dc.contributor.authorSchuster-Amft, Corina-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-28T13:26:49Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-28T13:26:49Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-14-
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/27767-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Motor imagery (MI) is a very popular and well-accepted technique in different disciplines. Originating from sport and psychology, MI is now also used in the field of medicine and education. Several studies confirmed the benefits of MI to facilitate motor learning and skill acquisition. The findings indicated that individual’s MI ability might influence the effectiveness of MI interventions. Over the last two centuries, researchers have developed several assessments to evaluate MI’s abstract construct. However, no systematic reviews (SR) exist for MI ability evaluation methods and their measurement properties. Methods and analysis: The SR will evaluate available MI ability assessments and their psychometric properties in four relevant disciplines: sports, psychology, medicine and education. This involves performing searches in SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Working independently, two reviewers will screen articles for selection. Then all raw information will be compiled in an overview table—including the articles’ characteristics (eg, a study’s setting or the population demographics) and the MI ability assessment (psychometric properties). To evaluate the articles’ methodological quality, we will use the COSMIN checklist. Then we will evaluate all the included assessments’ quality and perform a best-evidence synthesis. Results of this review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ethics and dissemination: The SR is based on published data, and ethical approval is not required. This review will provide information on assessment performance and equipment, as well as its main focus and usefulness. Furthermore, we will present the methodological quality of all the included articles and assess the included instruments’ quality. Ultimately, this will act as a valuable resource, providing an overview of MI ability assessments for individual clinical settings, treatment aims, and various populations. The SR’s final report will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Opende_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectAssessmentde_CH
dc.subjectMotor imagery abilityde_CH
dc.subjectPsychometric propertyde_CH
dc.subjectReliabilityde_CH
dc.subjectResponsivenessde_CH
dc.subjectValidityde_CH
dc.subjectHumande_CH
dc.subjectPsychometricsde_CH
dc.subjectAptitudede_CH
dc.subjectEducationde_CH
dc.subjectImageryde_CH
dc.subjectMedicinede_CH
dc.subjectMotor skillde_CH
dc.subjectPsychologyde_CH
dc.subjectSportde_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.82: Physiotherapiede_CH
dc.titleMotor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic reviewde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Physiotherapie (IPT)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-27767-
dc.identifier.pmid30552265de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue12de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.starte023439de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume8de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018_Suica-etal_Motor-imagery-ability-assessment-systematic-review-protocol.pdf460.91 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Suica, Z., Platteau-Waldmeier, P., Koppel, S., Schmidt-Trucksaess, A., Ettlin, T., & Schuster-Amft, C. (2018). Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 8(12), e023439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439
Suica, Z. et al. (2018) ‘Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review’, BMJ Open, 8(12), p. e023439. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439.
Z. Suica, P. Platteau-Waldmeier, S. Koppel, A. Schmidt-Trucksaess, T. Ettlin, and C. Schuster-Amft, “Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review,” BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 12, p. e023439, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439.
SUICA, Zorica, Petra PLATTEAU-WALDMEIER, Szabina KOPPEL, Arno SCHMIDT-TRUCKSAESS, Thierry ETTLIN und Corina SCHUSTER-AMFT, 2018. Motor imagery ability assessments in four disciplines: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 14 Dezember 2018. Bd. 8, Nr. 12, S. e023439. DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439
Suica, Zorica, Petra Platteau-Waldmeier, Szabina Koppel, Arno Schmidt-Trucksaess, Thierry Ettlin, and Corina Schuster-Amft. 2018. “Motor Imagery Ability Assessments in Four Disciplines: Protocol for a Systematic Review.” BMJ Open 8 (12): e023439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439.
Suica, Zorica, et al. “Motor Imagery Ability Assessments in Four Disciplines: Protocol for a Systematic Review.” BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 12, Dec. 2018, p. e023439, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023439.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.