Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-28404
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKubli, Merla-
dc.contributor.authorCanzi, Patrizio-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-04T14:23:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-04T14:23:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-17-
dc.identifier.issn13640321de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/28404-
dc.description.abstractFlexibility aggregation is seen as a promising solution to facilitate the integration of solar and wind power into the energy system. While the solution is well known, it remains fairly uninvestigated in terms of the components needed to result in a business success. This study investigates the long-term business dynamics of flexibility aggregators with a simulation model. Our study finds that new entrants in flexibility markets are likely to be trapped in a “technology valley of death” situation on account of being “too small to bid”. Therefore, we test different strategies to overcome this critical initial phase. Diversifying revenue streams and introducing a leasing offer for flexible prosumers to enlarge the customer base are promising strategies to reach the relevant bidding size required to compete in balancing power markets. The analysis offers insights on the long-term uncertainties of the business case. The findings of this paper contribute to the discussion on how to develop functioning and robust business models for low-carbon flexibility. Furthermore, the study is of high practical relevance, as one of the burning questions for new entrants in flexibility markets is addressed with a concrete strategy analysis.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectFlexibility aggregationde_CH
dc.subjectBusiness modelde_CH
dc.subjectVirtual power plantde_CH
dc.subjectProsumerde_CH
dc.subjectSystem dynamicsde_CH
dc.subjectBalancing power marketde_CH
dc.subject.ddc333.79: Energiede_CH
dc.titleBusiness strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid”de_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-28404-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.start110908de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume143de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Kubli-Canzi_Business-strategies-for-flexibility-aggregators.pdf8.16 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Kubli, M., & Canzi, P. (2021). Business strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908
Kubli, M. and Canzi, P. (2021) ‘Business strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid”’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, p. 110908. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908.
M. Kubli and P. Canzi, “Business strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid”,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 143, p. 110908, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908.
KUBLI, Merla und Patrizio CANZI, 2021. Business strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 17 März 2021. Bd. 143, S. 110908. DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908
Kubli, Merla, and Patrizio Canzi. 2021. “Business Strategies for Flexibility Aggregators to Steer Clear of Being “Too Small to Bid”.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 143 (March): 110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908.
Kubli, Merla, and Patrizio Canzi. “Business Strategies for Flexibility Aggregators to Steer Clear of Being “Too Small to Bid”.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 143, Mar. 2021, p. 110908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110908.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.