Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-29608
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenz, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorSandor, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorAngst, Felix-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T19:11:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T19:11:42Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.issn1651-2081de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/29608-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To quantify and compare associations and relationships between self-rated and tested assessments of mainly mobility-related physical function in different diagnoses. Design: Six longitudinal cohort studies before and after inpatient rehabilitation. Patients: Patients with whiplash-associated disorder (n = 71), low back pain (n = 121), fibromyalgia (n = 84), lipoedema (n = 27), lymphoedema (n = 78), and post-acute coronary syndrome (n = 64). Methods: Physical function was measured with the self-rated Short-Form 36 Physical functioning (SF-36 PF) and with the tested 6-Min Walk Distance (6MWD) and assessed by correlation coefficients. Across the 6 cohorts, the relationship between the 2 scores was compared using the ratio between them. Results: The correlations between the 2 scores were mostly moderate to strong at baseline (up to r = 0.791), and weak to moderate for the changes to follow-up (up to r = 0.408). The ratios SF-36 PF to 6MWD were 1.143–1.590 at baseline and 0.930–3.310 for the changes, and depended on pain and mental health. Conclusion: Moderate to strong cross-sectional and moderate to weak longitudinal correlations were found between the 6MWD and the SF-36 PF. Pain and mental health should be considered when interpreting physical function. For a comprehensive assessment in clinical practice and research, the combination of self-rated and tested physical function measures is recommended.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherMedical Journals Swedende_CH
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rehabilitation Medicinede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measurede_CH
dc.subjectPerformance-based measurementde_CH
dc.subject6-min walk testde_CH
dc.subjectSF-36de_CH
dc.subjectWalkingde_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.82: Physiotherapiede_CH
dc.titleRelationship between subjectively-rated and objectively-tested physical function across six different medical diagnosesde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Physiotherapie (IPT)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/jrm.v55.9383de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-29608-
dc.identifier.pmid38050460de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issuejrm9383de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume55de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_Benz-etal_Subjectively-rated-and-objectively-tested-physical-function_JRM.pdf436.11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Benz, T., Lehmann, S., Sandor, P., & Angst, F. (2023). Relationship between subjectively-rated and objectively-tested physical function across six different medical diagnoses. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(jrm9383). https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.9383
Benz, T. et al. (2023) ‘Relationship between subjectively-rated and objectively-tested physical function across six different medical diagnoses’, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(jrm9383). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.9383.
T. Benz, S. Lehmann, P. Sandor, and F. Angst, “Relationship between subjectively-rated and objectively-tested physical function across six different medical diagnoses,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 55, no. jrm9383, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.9383.
BENZ, Thomas, Susanne LEHMANN, Peter SANDOR und Felix ANGST, 2023. Relationship between subjectively-rated and objectively-tested physical function across six different medical diagnoses. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. Dezember 2023. Bd. 55, Nr. jrm9383. DOI 10.2340/jrm.v55.9383
Benz, Thomas, Susanne Lehmann, Peter Sandor, and Felix Angst. 2023. “Relationship between Subjectively-Rated and Objectively-Tested Physical Function across Six Different Medical Diagnoses.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 55 (jrm9383). https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.9383.
Benz, Thomas, et al. “Relationship between Subjectively-Rated and Objectively-Tested Physical Function across Six Different Medical Diagnoses.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 55, no. jrm9383, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.9383.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.