Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-30293
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Eliot-
dc.contributor.authorDurdina, Lukas-
dc.contributor.authorSmallwood, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorSpirig, Curdin-
dc.contributor.authorEdebeli, Jacinta-
dc.contributor.authorRoth, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorBrem, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorSevcenco, Yura-
dc.contributor.authorCrayford, Andrew-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-16T10:32:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-16T10:32:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-24-
dc.identifier.issn0021-8502de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/30293-
dc.description.abstractTo reduce the adverse impact of civil aviation on local air quality and human health, a new international standard for non-volatile Particulate Matter (nvPM) number and mass emissions was recently adopted. A system loss correction method, which accounts for the significant size-dependent particle loss, is also detailed to predict nvPM emissions representative of those at engine exit for emissions inventory purposes. As Particle-Size-Distribution (PSD) measurement is currently not prescribed, the existing loss correction method uses the nvPM number and mass measurements along with several assumptions to predict a PSD, resulting in significant uncertainty. Three new system loss correction methodologies using measured PSD were developed and compared with the existing regulatory method using certification-like nvPM data reported by the Swiss and European nvPM reference systems for thirty-two civil turbofan engines representative of the current fleet. Additionally, the PSD statistics of three sizing instruments typically used in these systems (SMPS, DMS500 and EEPS) were compared on a generic aero-engine combustor rig. General agreement between the three new PSD loss correction methods was observed, with both nvPM number- and mass-based system loss correction factors (kSL_num and kSL_mass) within ±10% reported across the engines tested. By comparison, the existing regulatory method was seen to underpredict kSL_num by up to 67% and overpredict kSL_mass by up to 49% when compared with the measured-PSD-based methods, typically driven by low nvPM mass concentrations and small particle size. In terms of the particle sizing instrument inter-comparison, an agreement of ±2 nm for the GMD and ±0.08 for the GSD was observed across a range of particle sizes on the combustor rig. However, it was seen that these differences can result in a 19% bias for kSL_num and 8% for kSL_mass for the measured-PSD-based methods, highlighting the need for further work towards the standardisation of PSD measurement for regulatory purposes.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Aerosol Sciencede_CH
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectParticle transport lossde_CH
dc.subjectAviationde_CH
dc.subjectNon-volatile Particulate Matter (nvPM)de_CH
dc.subjectParticle size distributionde_CH
dc.subjectSampling system loss correctionde_CH
dc.subject.ddc629: Luftfahrt- und Fahrzeugtechnikde_CH
dc.titleCorrection for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle sizede_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitZentrum für Aviatik (ZAV)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-30293-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue106140de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume169de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_Durand-etal_Corrections-particle-loss-regulatory-aviation-nvPM_jaerosci.pdf6.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Durand, E., Durdina, L., Smallwood, G., Johnson, M., Spirig, C., Edebeli, J., Roth, M., Brem, B., Sevcenco, Y., & Crayford, A. (2023). Correction for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle size. Journal of Aerosol Science, 169(106140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140
Durand, E. et al. (2023) ‘Correction for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle size’, Journal of Aerosol Science, 169(106140). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140.
E. Durand et al., “Correction for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle size,” Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 169, no. 106140, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140.
DURAND, Eliot, Lukas DURDINA, Greg SMALLWOOD, Mark JOHNSON, Curdin SPIRIG, Jacinta EDEBELI, Manuel ROTH, Benjamin BREM, Yura SEVCENCO und Andrew CRAYFORD, 2023. Correction for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle size. Journal of Aerosol Science. 24 Januar 2023. Bd. 169, Nr. 106140. DOI 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140
Durand, Eliot, Lukas Durdina, Greg Smallwood, Mark Johnson, Curdin Spirig, Jacinta Edebeli, Manuel Roth, Benjamin Brem, Yura Sevcenco, and Andrew Crayford. 2023. “Correction for Particle Loss in a Regulatory Aviation nvPM Emissions System Using Measured Particle Size.” Journal of Aerosol Science 169 (106140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140.
Durand, Eliot, et al. “Correction for Particle Loss in a Regulatory Aviation nvPM Emissions System Using Measured Particle Size.” Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 169, no. 106140, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.