Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-30733
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorContzen, Nadja-
dc.contributor.authorPerlaviciute, Goda-
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorReckels, Sophie Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Susana-
dc.contributor.authorBidwell, David-
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Gisela-
dc.contributor.authorBonaiuto, Marino-
dc.contributor.authorChou, Li-Fang-
dc.contributor.authorCorral-Verdugo, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorDessi, Federica-
dc.contributor.authorDietz, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDoran, Rouven-
dc.contributor.authorEulálio, Maria do Carmo-
dc.contributor.authorFielding, Kelly-
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Román, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorGranskaya, Juliana V.-
dc.contributor.authorGurikova, Tatyana-
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Bernardo-
dc.contributor.authorKabakova, Maira P.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chieh-Yu-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fan-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Maria Luísa-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Lu-
dc.contributor.authorLuís, Sílvia-
dc.contributor.authorMuinos, Gabriel-
dc.contributor.authorOgunbode, Charles A.-
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, María Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorPidgeon, Nick-
dc.contributor.authorPitt, Maria Argüello-
dc.contributor.authorRahimi, Leila-
dc.contributor.authorRevokatova, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.authorReyna, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorSchuitema, Geertje-
dc.contributor.authorShwom, Rachael-
dc.contributor.authorYalcinkaya, Nur Soylu-
dc.contributor.authorSpence, Elspeth-
dc.contributor.authorSütterlin, Bernadette-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T13:11:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-24T13:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-29-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0009de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1573-1480de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/30733-
dc.description.abstractSome argue that complementing climate change mitigation measures with solar radiation management (SRM) might prove a last resort to limit global warming to 1.5 °C. To make a socially responsible decision on whether to use SRM, it is important to consider also public opinion, across the globe and particularly in the Global South, which would face the greatest risks from both global warming and SRM. However, most research on public opinion about SRM stems from the Global North. We report findings from the first large-scale, cross-cultural study on the public opinion about SRM among the general public (N=2,248) and students (N=4,583) in 20 countries covering all inhabited continents, including five countries from the Global South and five ‘non-WEIRD’ (i.e. not Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic) countries from the Global North. As public awareness of SRM is usually low, we provided participants with information on SRM, including key arguments in favour of and against SRM that appear in the scientific debate. On average, acceptability of SRM was significantly higher in the Global South than in the ‘non-WEIRD’ Global North, while acceptability in the ‘WEIRD’ Global North was in between. However, we found substantial variation within these clusters, especially in the ‘non-WEIRD’ Global North, suggesting that countries do not form homogenous clusters and should thus be considered individually. Moreover, the average participants’ views, while generally neither strong nor polarised, differed from some expert views in important ways, including that participants perceived SRM as only slightly effective in limiting glob al warming. Still, our data suggests overall a conditional, reluctant acceptance. That is, while on average, people think SRM would have mostly negative consequences, they may till be willing to tolerate it as a potential last resort to fight global warming, particularly if they think SRM has only minor negative (or even positive) impacts on humans and nature.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSpringerde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofClimatic Changede_CH
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectClimate engineeringde_CH
dc.subjectPublic opinionde_CH
dc.subjectPerceived riskde_CH
dc.subjectPerceived benefitde_CH
dc.subjectPerceived justicede_CH
dc.subjectTechnology acceptancede_CH
dc.subject.ddc363: Umwelt- und Sicherheitsproblemede_CH
dc.titlePublic opinion about solar radiation management : a cross-cultural study in 20 countries around the worldde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-30733-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue4de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.start65de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume177de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2024_Contzen-etal_Public-opinion-about-solar-radiation-management.pdf3.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Contzen, N., Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L., Reckels, S. C., Alves, S., Bidwell, D., Böhm, G., Bonaiuto, M., Chou, L.-F., Corral-Verdugo, V., Dessi, F., Dietz, T., Doran, R., Eulálio, M. d. C., Fielding, K., Gómez-Román, C., Granskaya, J. V., Gurikova, T., Hernández, B., et al. (2024). Public opinion about solar radiation management : a cross-cultural study in 20 countries around the world. Climatic Change, 177(4), 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3
Contzen, N. et al. (2024) ‘Public opinion about solar radiation management : a cross-cultural study in 20 countries around the world’, Climatic Change, 177(4), p. 65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3.
N. Contzen et al., “Public opinion about solar radiation management : a cross-cultural study in 20 countries around the world,” Climatic Change, vol. 177, no. 4, p. 65, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3.
CONTZEN, Nadja, Goda PERLAVICIUTE, Linda STEG, Sophie Charlotte RECKELS, Susana ALVES, David BIDWELL, Gisela BÖHM, Marino BONAIUTO, Li-Fang CHOU, Victor CORRAL-VERDUGO, Federica DESSI, Thomas DIETZ, Rouven DORAN, Maria do Carmo EULÁLIO, Kelly FIELDING, Cristina GÓMEZ-ROMÁN, Juliana V. GRANSKAYA, Tatyana GURIKOVA, Bernardo HERNÁNDEZ, Maira P. KABAKOVA, Chieh-Yu LEE, Fan LI, Maria Luísa LIMA, Lu LIU, Sílvia LUÍS, Gabriel MUINOS, Charles A. OGUNBODE, María Victoria ORTIZ, Nick PIDGEON, Maria Argüello PITT, Leila RAHIMI, Anastasia REVOKATOVA, Cecilia REYNA, Geertje SCHUITEMA, Rachael SHWOM, Nur Soylu YALCINKAYA, Elspeth SPENCE und Bernadette SÜTTERLIN, 2024. Public opinion about solar radiation management : a cross-cultural study in 20 countries around the world. Climatic Change. 29 März 2024. Bd. 177, Nr. 4, S. 65. DOI 10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3
Contzen, Nadja, Goda Perlaviciute, Linda Steg, Sophie Charlotte Reckels, Susana Alves, David Bidwell, Gisela Böhm, et al. 2024. “Public Opinion About Solar Radiation Management : A Cross-Cultural Study in 20 Countries around the World.” Climatic Change 177 (4): 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3.
Contzen, Nadja, et al. “Public Opinion About Solar Radiation Management : A Cross-Cultural Study in 20 Countries around the World.” Climatic Change, vol. 177, no. 4, Mar. 2024, p. 65, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03708-3.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.