1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorPage, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorLilja, Margareta-
dc.contributor.authorKottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-03T12:59:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-03T12:59:41Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2214de_CH
dc.identifier.issn0305-1862de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/4595-
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G) when used in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Method: A total of 118 girls and 144 boys participated in this study; 198 of the children (75.6%) had a developmental disability and 64 (24.4%) were without a known disability. The mean age was four years (range 11 months to 10 years and six months, SD 1.91). Item goodness of fit, differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) were evaluated by use of a Rasch model. Results: Twenty-four (11.6%) out of 206 items of the Functional Skills Scale and one (5%) out of 20 items of the Caregiver Assistance Scale demonstrated misfit according to the Rasch model. Thirtyfour (16.5%) out of 206 items of the Functional Skills Scale and no item from the Caregiver Assistance Scale demonstrated DIF. Almost half (46%) of the items demonstrating misfit also demonstrated DIF, indicating an association between them. The DIF by country only demonstrated a minimal impact on the person measures of the PEDI-G. Interpretation: Even though some items did not meet the statistical and clinical criteria set, the PEDI-G can be used, on a preliminary basis as a valid tool to measure activities of daily living of children with and without a disability in these countries. Further larger studies are needed to evaluate more psychometric item properties of the PEDI-G in relation to context.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherWileyde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofChild: Care, Health and Developmentde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectValidityde_CH
dc.subjectDisabilityde_CH
dc.subjectChildde_CH
dc.subjectAssessmentde_CH
dc.subject.ddc610: Medizin und Gesundheitde_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.8515: Ergotherapiede_CH
dc.titleCross‐cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : a Rasch model applicationde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cch.12401de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end58de_CH
zhaw.pages.start48de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume43de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Schulze, C., Page, J., Lilja, M., & Kottorp, A. B. M. (2017). Cross‐cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : a Rasch model application. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12401
Schulze, C. et al. (2017) ‘Cross‐cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : a Rasch model application’, Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(1), pp. 48–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12401.
C. Schulze, J. Page, M. Lilja, and A. B. M. Kottorp, “Cross‐cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : a Rasch model application,” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 48–58, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cch.12401.
SCHULZE, Christina, Julie PAGE, Margareta LILJA und Anders Börje Mauritz KOTTORP, 2017. Cross‐cultural validity of the German version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : a Rasch model application. Child: Care, Health and Development. Januar 2017. Bd. 43, Nr. 1, S. 48–58. DOI 10.1111/cch.12401
Schulze, Christina, Julie Page, Margareta Lilja, and Anders Börje Mauritz Kottorp. 2017. “Cross‐Cultural Validity of the German Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : A Rasch Model Application.” Child: Care, Health and Development 43 (1): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12401.
Schulze, Christina, et al. “Cross‐Cultural Validity of the German Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI‐G) : A Rasch Model Application.” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 43, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 48–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12401.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.