Publication type: Article in scientific journal
Type of review: Peer review (publication)
Title: Comparison of clinical vignettes and standardized patients as measures of physiotherapists’ activity and work recommendations in patients with non-specific low back pain
Authors: Brunner, Emanuel
Probst, Michel
Meichtry, André
Luomajoki, Hannu
Dankaerts, Wim
DOI: 10.1177/0269215515570499
Published in: Clinical Rehabilitation
Volume(Issue): 30
Issue: 1
Page(s): 85
Pages to: 94
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher / Ed. Institution: Sage
ISSN: 0269-2155
Language: English
Subjects: Clinical vignettes; Validity; Standardized patients; Low back pain
Subject (DDC): 615.82: Physical therapy
617.5: Orthopaedic surgery
Abstract: Objective: To validate clinical vignettes as a measure of physiotherapists’ activity and work recommendations given to patients with non-specific low back pain. Design: Validation study comparing two methods for measuring aspects of health providers’ clinical management: Clinical vignettes and unannounced visits of standardized patients (the gold standard). Setting: Outpatient physiotherapy clinics. Subjects: Physiotherapists (N = 59) who consented to see unannounced standardized patients in their clinical practice. Main measures: Clinical vignettes were used to initially measure physiotherapists’ self-reported activity and work recommendations. Subsequently, actors performing as standardized patients visited physiotherapists in their clinical practice and rated the advice given by the physiotherapist regarding activity and work. A total of 23 standardized patients were randomly scheduled to physiotherapists. Physiotherapists were blinded towards the standardized patients. To test whether standardized patients were detected, physiotherapists reported if they suspected that they had treated an actor. Results: The 23 standardized patients visited 22 different physiotherapists. Physiotherapists detected 12 out of 23 unannounced standardized patients (detection rate: 52%). The estimated agreement between the two measures was poor, for both activity and work recommendations (weighted kappa coefficients: 0.29 resp. -0.21). Conclusion: The poor concordance between clinical vignettes and standardized patients indicates the potentially limited validity of clinical vignettes as a measure of health providers’ activity and work recommendations in low back pain practice.
Fulltext version: Published version
License (according to publishing contract): Licence according to publishing contract
Departement: School of Health Sciences
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.