Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKubli, Merla-
dc.contributor.authorLoock, Moritz-
dc.contributor.authorWüstenhagen, Rolf-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T09:16:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-12T09:16:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1873-6777de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5220-
dc.description.abstractRising shares of fluctuating renewables increase the need for flexibility in the power market. At the same time, the emergence of the prosumer has created new opportunities for co-creation of distributed flexibility. As of yet, there is surprisingly little empirical analysis in terms of whether individuals are actually ready to co-create flexibility, and if so, under which conditions these resources can be mobilized by grid operators or electricity supply companies. We address this gap in the energy economics literature with three studies analyzing in total 7′216 individual decisions in a series of choice experiments with 902 study participants in three main domains of residential energy prosumption: (1) solar PV plus storage, (2) electric mobility, (3) heat pumps. We develop a novel measure of the prosumers’ willingness to co-create flexibility, and solicit their preferences for power supply contracts with varying levels of flexibility to derive implied discomfort costs. Our results indicate that current and potential electric car and solar PV users exhibit a higher willingness to co-create flexibility than heat pump users. Reaping the potential in those two domains requires taking the prosumer perspective into account when designing policy instruments and creating adequate business models.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Policyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectSolar photovoltaicde_CH
dc.subjectBattery storagede_CH
dc.subjectVehicle-to-gridde_CH
dc.subjectConsumer behaviorde_CH
dc.subjectBusiness modelde_CH
dc.subjectSmart gridde_CH
dc.subject.ddc333.79: Energiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc338.927: Umweltökonomie und nachhaltige Entwicklungde_CH
dc.titleThe flexible prosumer : measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibilityde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end548de_CH
zhaw.pages.start540de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume114de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedErneuerbare Energiende_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Kubli, M., Loock, M., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2018). The flexible prosumer : measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility. Energy Policy, 114, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044
Kubli, M., Loock, M. and Wüstenhagen, R. (2018) ‘The flexible prosumer : measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility’, Energy Policy, 114, pp. 540–548. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044.
M. Kubli, M. Loock, and R. Wüstenhagen, “The flexible prosumer : measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility,” Energy Policy, vol. 114, pp. 540–548, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044.
KUBLI, Merla, Moritz LOOCK und Rolf WÜSTENHAGEN, 2018. The flexible prosumer : measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility. Energy Policy. 2018. Bd. 114, S. 540–548. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044
Kubli, Merla, Moritz Loock, and Rolf Wüstenhagen. 2018. “The Flexible Prosumer : Measuring the Willingness to Co-Create Distributed Flexibility.” Energy Policy 114: 540–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044.
Kubli, Merla, et al. “The Flexible Prosumer : Measuring the Willingness to Co-Create Distributed Flexibility.” Energy Policy, vol. 114, 2018, pp. 540–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.