1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4285
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGross, Mechthild Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMatterne, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorBerlage, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Annette-
dc.contributor.authorLack, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorMacher-Heidrich, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorMisselwitz, Björn-
dc.contributor.authorBahlmann, Franz-
dc.contributor.authorFalbrede, Jörg-
dc.contributor.authorHillemanns, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorvon Kaisenberg, Constantin-
dc.contributor.authorvon Koch, Franz Edler-
dc.contributor.authorSchild, Ralf L.-
dc.contributor.authorStepan, Holger-
dc.contributor.authorDevane, Declan-
dc.contributor.authorMikolajczyk, Rafael-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-16T13:09:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-16T13:09:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1619-3997de_CH
dc.identifier.issn0300-5577de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8165-
dc.description.abstractAims: Regional and interinstitutional variations have been recognized in the increasing incidence of caesarean section. Modes of birth after previous caesarean section vary widely, ranging from elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and unplanned repeat caesarean section (URCS) after trial of labour to vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). This study describes interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after previous caesarean section in relation to regional indicators in Germany. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study using the birth registers of six maternity units (n=12,060) in five different German states (n=370,209). Indicators were tested by χ2 and relative deviations from regional values were expressed as relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The percentages of women in the six units with previous caesarean section ranged from 11.9% to 15.9% (P=0.002). VBAC was planned for 36.0% to 49.8% (P=0.003) of these women, but actually completed in only 26.2% to 32.8% (P=0.66). Depending on the indicator, the units studied deviated from the regional data by up to 32% [relative risk 0.68 (0.47–0.97)] in respect of completed VBAC among all initiated VBAC. Conclusions: There is substantial interinstitutional variation in mode of birth following previous caesarean section. This variation is in addition to regional patterns.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherDe Gruyterde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Perinatal Medicinede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectCesarean section, repeatde_CH
dc.subjectCross-sectional studiesde_CH
dc.subjectPregnancyde_CH
dc.subjectVaginal birth after cesareande_CH
dc.subjectMode of birthde_CH
dc.subject.ddc618.4: Geburtde_CH
dc.titleInterinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section : a cross-sectional study in six German hospitalsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Hebammenwissenschaft und reproduktive Gesundheit (IHG)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-4285-
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/jpm-2014-0108de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid25395596de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue2de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end184de_CH
zhaw.pages.start177de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume43de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2015_Gross_Interinstitutional_variations_in_mode.pdf280.04 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Gross, M. M., Matterne, A., Berlage, S., Kaiser, A., Lack, N., Macher-Heidrich, S., Misselwitz, B., Bahlmann, F., Falbrede, J., Hillemanns, P., von Kaisenberg, C., von Koch, F. E., Schild, R. L., Stepan, H., Devane, D., & Mikolajczyk, R. (2015). Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section : a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 43(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4285
Gross, M.M. et al. (2015) ‘Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section : a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals’, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 43(2), pp. 177–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4285.
M. M. Gross et al., “Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section : a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2015, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-4285.
GROSS, Mechthild Maria, Andrea MATTERNE, Silvia BERLAGE, Annette KAISER, Nicholas LACK, Susanne MACHER-HEIDRICH, Björn MISSELWITZ, Franz BAHLMANN, Jörg FALBREDE, Peter HILLEMANNS, Constantin VON KAISENBERG, Franz Edler VON KOCH, Ralf L. SCHILD, Holger STEPAN, Declan DEVANE und Rafael MIKOLAJCZYK, 2015. Interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after a previous caesarean section : a cross-sectional study in six German hospitals. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2015. Bd. 43, Nr. 2, S. 177–184. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-4285
Gross, Mechthild Maria, Andrea Matterne, Silvia Berlage, Annette Kaiser, Nicholas Lack, Susanne Macher-Heidrich, Björn Misselwitz, et al. 2015. “Interinstitutional Variations in Mode of Birth after a Previous Caesarean Section : A Cross-Sectional Study in Six German Hospitals.” Journal of Perinatal Medicine 43 (2): 177–84. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4285.
Gross, Mechthild Maria, et al. “Interinstitutional Variations in Mode of Birth after a Previous Caesarean Section : A Cross-Sectional Study in Six German Hospitals.” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, 2015, pp. 177–84, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4285.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.