Publication type: | Article in scientific journal |
Type of review: | Peer review (publication) |
Title: | Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire |
Authors: | Kaptain, Rina Juel Kottorp, Anders Patomella, Ann-Helen Helle, Tina |
DOI: | 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910 |
Published in: | Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy |
Volume(Issue): | 26 |
Issue: | 3 |
Page(s): | 226 |
Pages to: | 234 |
Issue Date: | 26-Oct-2017 |
Publisher / Ed. Institution: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 1103-8128 1651-2014 |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Agreement; Svensson’s method; Everyday technology; Occupational therapy; Psychometrics; Translation |
Subject (DDC): | 362: Health and social services 616: Internal medicine and diseases |
Abstract: | Background: Everyday technologies are naturally integrated in people’s daily life. For older adults and adults living with a chronic disease like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the ability to use technologies for health management has become increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) in a sample of older adults with (n = 23) and without (n = 24) COPD. Material and method: The ETUQ was initially translated in accordance with the dual panel approach and then administered to a sample of 47 participants. Svensson’s method for paired ordinal data was utilized to calculate and analyze reliability. Results: Overall, inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the ETUQ demonstrated excellent percentage agreement (PA) (>75%), although for test-retest reliability, nine items demonstrated fair (53%) to good (73%) agreement. Conclusion: This study supports the use of the Danish version of the ETUQ in a sample of older adults with or without COPD. Application to practice: The Danish version of the ETUQ is an evidence-based evaluation that can reliably contribute to clinical occupational therapy and research in Denmark focusing on everyday technology use. |
URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8465 |
Fulltext version: | Published version |
License (according to publishing contract): | Licence according to publishing contract |
Departement: | School of Health Sciences |
Organisational Unit: | Institute of Occupational Therapy (IER) |
Appears in collections: | Publikationen Gesundheit |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Kaptain, R. J., Kottorp, A., Patomella, A.-H., & Helle, T. (2017). Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910
Kaptain, R.J. et al. (2017) ‘Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire’, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), pp. 226–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
R. J. Kaptain, A. Kottorp, A.-H. Patomella, and T. Helle, “Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 226–234, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
KAPTAIN, Rina Juel, Anders KOTTORP, Ann-Helen PATOMELLA und Tina HELLE, 2017. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 26 Oktober 2017. Bd. 26, Nr. 3, S. 226–234. DOI 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910
Kaptain, Rina Juel, Anders Kottorp, Ann-Helen Patomella, and Tina Helle. 2017. “Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of the Danish Version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 26 (3): 226–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
Kaptain, Rina Juel, et al. “Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of the Danish Version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 26, no. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 226–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.