Publication type: Article in scientific journal
Type of review: Peer review (publication)
Title: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire
Authors: Kaptain, Rina Juel
Kottorp, Anders
Patomella, Ann-Helen
Helle, Tina
DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume(Issue): 26
Issue: 3
Page(s): 226
Pages to: 234
Issue Date: 26-Oct-2017
Publisher / Ed. Institution: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1103-8128
1651-2014
Language: English
Subjects: Agreement; Svensson’s method; Everyday technology; Occupational therapy; Psychometrics; Translation
Subject (DDC): 362: Health and social services
616: Internal medicine and diseases
Abstract: Background: Everyday technologies are naturally integrated in people’s daily life. For older adults and adults living with a chronic disease like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the ability to use technologies for health management has become increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) in a sample of older adults with (n = 23) and without (n = 24) COPD. Material and method: The ETUQ was initially translated in accordance with the dual panel approach and then administered to a sample of 47 participants. Svensson’s method for paired ordinal data was utilized to calculate and analyze reliability. Results: Overall, inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the ETUQ demonstrated excellent percentage agreement (PA) (>75%), although for test-retest reliability, nine items demonstrated fair (53%) to good (73%) agreement. Conclusion: This study supports the use of the Danish version of the ETUQ in a sample of older adults with or without COPD. Application to practice: The Danish version of the ETUQ is an evidence-based evaluation that can reliably contribute to clinical occupational therapy and research in Denmark focusing on everyday technology use.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8465
Fulltext version: Published version
License (according to publishing contract): Licence according to publishing contract
Departement: School of Health Sciences
Organisational Unit: Institute of Occupational Therapy (IER)
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Kaptain, R. J., Kottorp, A., Patomella, A.-H., & Helle, T. (2017). Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910
Kaptain, R.J. et al. (2017) ‘Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire’, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), pp. 226–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
R. J. Kaptain, A. Kottorp, A.-H. Patomella, and T. Helle, “Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 226–234, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
KAPTAIN, Rina Juel, Anders KOTTORP, Ann-Helen PATOMELLA und Tina HELLE, 2017. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 26 Oktober 2017. Bd. 26, Nr. 3, S. 226–234. DOI 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910
Kaptain, Rina Juel, Anders Kottorp, Ann-Helen Patomella, and Tina Helle. 2017. “Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of the Danish Version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 26 (3): 226–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.
Kaptain, Rina Juel, et al. “Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of the Danish Version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 26, no. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 226–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.