1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3899
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalinowsky, Camilla-
dc.contributor.authorKottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz-
dc.contributor.authorWallin, Anders-
dc.contributor.authorNordlund, Arto-
dc.contributor.authorBjörklund, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorMelin, Ilse-
dc.contributor.authorPernevik, Anette-
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorNygård, Louise-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T09:19:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-26T09:19:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1041-6102de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1741-203Xde_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8517-
dc.descriptionErworben im Rahmen der Schweizer Nationallizenzen (http://www.nationallizenzen.ch)de_CH
dc.description.abstractBackground: To use valid subjective reports sensible to cognitive decline is vital to identify very early signs of dementia development. Use of everyday technology (ET) has been shown to be sensitive to differentiate adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from controls, but the group with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) has not yet been examined. This study aims to investigate and compare self-perceived ability in ET use and number of ETs reported as actually used in a sample of older adults with SCI, MCI, and older adults with no known cognitive impairment, i.e. controls. Methods: Older adults with MCI (n = 29), SCI ( n = 26), and controls (n = 30) were interviewed with the short version of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (S-ETUQ) to capture self-perceived ability in ET use and number of ETs used. To generate individual measures of ability to use ET, Rasch analysis was used. The measures were then compared group-wise using ANCOVA. The numbers of ETs used were compared group-wise with ANOVA. Results: Controls versus SCI and MCI differed significantly regarding ETs reported as used, but not SCI versus MCI. Similarly, in ability to use ET, controls versus SCI and MCI differed significantly but not SCI versus MCI. Conclusions: The significantly lower numbers of ETs reported as actually used and the lower ability in SCI and MCI groups compared to controls suggest that ET use is affected already in very minor cognitive decline. This indicates that self-reported ET use based on the S-ETUQ is sensitive to detect changes already in SCI.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Psychogeriatricsde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectADLde_CH
dc.subjectCognitive impairmentde_CH
dc.subjectActivity of daily livingde_CH
dc.subjectAgedde_CH
dc.subjectCognitive dysfunctionde_CH
dc.subjectDementiade_CH
dc.subjectFemalede_CH
dc.subjectHumande_CH
dc.subjectMalede_CH
dc.subjectMiddle agedde_CH
dc.subjectMultivariate analysisde_CH
dc.subjectNeuropsychological testde_CH
dc.subjectPsychiatric status rating scalede_CH
dc.subjectRegression analysisde_CH
dc.subjectSelf conceptde_CH
dc.subjectSurvey and questionnairede_CH
dc.subjectSwedende_CH
dc.subject.ddc616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystemsde_CH
dc.titleAre there differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairmentde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Ergotherapie (IER)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3899-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610217000643de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid28412981de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue7de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end1200de_CH
zhaw.pages.start1193de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume29de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2023-01-01de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedAngewandte Gerontologiede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
differences_in_the_use_of_everyday_technology_among_persons_with_mci_sci_and_older_adults_without_known_cognitive_impairment.pdf196.46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Malinowsky, C., Kottorp, A. B. M., Wallin, A., Nordlund, A., Björklund, E., Melin, I., Pernevik, A., Rosenberg, L., & Nygård, L. (2017). Are there differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(7), 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3899
Malinowsky, C. et al. (2017) ‘Are there differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment’, International Psychogeriatrics, 29(7), pp. 1193–1200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3899.
C. Malinowsky et al., “Are there differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1193–1200, 2017, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3899.
MALINOWSKY, Camilla, Anders Börje Mauritz KOTTORP, Anders WALLIN, Arto NORDLUND, Eva BJÖRKLUND, Ilse MELIN, Anette PERNEVIK, Lena ROSENBERG und Louise NYGÅRD, 2017. Are there differences in the use of everyday technology among persons with MCI, SCI and older adults without known cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics. 2017. Bd. 29, Nr. 7, S. 1193–1200. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3899
Malinowsky, Camilla, Anders Börje Mauritz Kottorp, Anders Wallin, Arto Nordlund, Eva Björklund, Ilse Melin, Anette Pernevik, Lena Rosenberg, and Louise Nygård. 2017. “Are There Differences in the Use of Everyday Technology among Persons with MCI, SCI and Older Adults without Known Cognitive Impairment.” International Psychogeriatrics 29 (7): 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3899.
Malinowsky, Camilla, et al. “Are There Differences in the Use of Everyday Technology among Persons with MCI, SCI and Older Adults without Known Cognitive Impairment.” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 29, no. 7, 2017, pp. 1193–200, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3899.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.